LawWiki
HomeCodesSearchGlossaryAPIAbout
LawWiki

Plain English summaries of California law with zero-hallucination AI. Every summary is verified against official source text.

Product

  • Search
  • Codes
  • About

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Disclaimer

© 2026 LawWiki. All rights reserved.

HomeHealth and Safety CodeDiv. 104Pt. 5Ch. 8Art. 3§ 111885 Embargoed Product Destruction Costs

§ 111885 Embargoed Product Destruction Costs

Health and Safety Code·California
AI Summary·Official Text·Key Terms·Related Statutes·References
AI SummaryVerified

§ 111885 Embargoed Product Destruction Costs

Key Takeaways

  • •If a food, drug, or cosmetic is found to be unsafe, fake, or incorrectly labeled, the court can order it to be destroyed.
  • •The owner of the unsafe product has to pay for the destruction and any court or investigation costs.
  • •If the problem can be fixed (like adding the right label), the owner might get the product back after paying all costs and promising to fix it.
  • •The owner must pay for someone to watch them fix the product to make sure it’s done right.

Example

A company sells a drink with a label that says it has no sugar, but tests show it actually has sugar.

The court can order all the drinks to be destroyed, and the company has to pay for it. If the company can fix the label to show the real sugar amount, they might get the drinks back after paying all the costs and promising to fix the labels correctly.

AI-generated — May contain errors. Not legal advice. Always verify source.

Official Source
View on CA.gov

§ 111885 Embargoed Product Destruction Costs

If the court finds that an embargoed food, drug, device, or cosmetic is adulterated, misbranded, falsely advertised, or the sale of which is otherwise in violation of this part, the food, drug, device, or cosmetic shall, after entry of the judgment, be destroyed at the expense of the claimant or owner, under the supervision of an authorized agent of the department. All court costs and fees and all reasonable costs incurred by the department in investigating and prosecuting the action, including, but not limited to, the costs of storage and testing, shall be taxed against the claimant or owner of the food, drug, device, or cosmetic or his or her agent. When the adulteration or misbranding can be corrected by proper labeling or processing of the food, drug, device, or cosmetic, or when the false advertisement can be corrected and when all provisions of this part can be complied with, then, after entry of the judgment and after costs, fees, and expenses have been paid and a good and sufficient bond, conditioned that the food, drug, device, or cosmetic will be brought into compliance, the court may, by order, direct that the food, drug, device, or cosmetic be delivered to the claimant or owner to be brought into compliance by labeling, processing, or other means under the supervision of an authorized agent of the department. The expense of the supervision shall be paid by the claimant or owner. The bond shall be discharged when the court finds that the food, drug, device, or cosmetic is no longer held for sale in violation of this part and that all of the expenses of supervision have been paid. (Added by Stats. 1995, Ch. 415, Sec. 6. Effective January 1, 1996.)

Last verified: January 23, 2026

Key Terms

adulteratedmisbrandedfalsely advertisedcompliancebond

Related Statutes

  • § 111860 Embargo Of Violative Products
  • § 111870 Embargoed Product Release Process
  • § 111880 Condemnation Of Violative Products
  • § 110140 Inspection Authority Enforcement
  • § 110245 Dealer Protection For Packaged Goods

References

  • Official text at leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
  • California Legislature. Health and Safety Code. Section 111885.
View Official Source