LawWiki
HomeCodesSearchGlossaryAPIAbout
LawWiki

Plain English summaries of California law with zero-hallucination AI. Every summary is verified against official source text.

Product

  • Search
  • Codes
  • About

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Disclaimer

© 2026 LawWiki. All rights reserved.

HomeFish and Game CodeDiv. 3Ch. 1.5Art. 1§ 2053 Species Habitat Protection Alternatives

§ 2053 Species Habitat Protection Alternatives

Fish and Game Code·California
AI Summary·Official Text·Key Terms·Related Statutes·References
AI SummaryVerified

§ 2053 Species Habitat Protection Alternatives

This law says the state won't let public projects go ahead if they would hurt endangered or threatened animals or their homes, when there are reasonable ways to avoid that.

Key Takeaways

  • •Agencies must not approve projects that would endanger protected species if reasonable alternatives exist.
  • •They must work with the project owner and the state lead agency to find careful alternatives that still meet the project's purpose.
  • •The main goal is to protect endangered or threatened species and their habitats while still allowing projects to happen as much as possible.

Example

A city wants to build a new road that would cut through a forest where an endangered frog lives.

The agency in charge has to look for other routes or designs that protect the frog's habitat, instead of just building the road as planned, because there are reasonable alternatives that can still get the road built.

AI-generated — May contain errors. Not legal advice. Always verify source.

Official Source
View on CA.gov

§ 2053 Species Habitat Protection Alternatives

(a) The Legislature further finds and declares that it is the policy of the state that public agencies should not approve projects as proposed which would jeopardize the continued existence of any endangered species or threatened species or result in the destruction or adverse modification of habitat essential to the continued existence of those species, if there are reasonable and prudent alternatives available consistent with conserving the species or its habitat which would prevent jeopardy. (b) Furthermore, it is the policy of this state and the intent of the Legislature that reasonable and prudent alternatives shall be developed by the department, together with the project proponent and the state lead agency, consistent with conserving the species, while at the same time maintaining the project purpose to the greatest extent possible. (Amended by Stats. 2018, Ch. 329, Sec. 1. (SB 473) Effective January 1, 2019.)

Last verified: January 10, 2026

Key Terms

endangered speciesthreatened speciesreasonable and prudent alternativeshabitat essential to the continued existence

Related Statutes

  • § 2052 Endangered Species Habitat Protection
  • § 2052.1 Species Impact Mitigation Limits
  • § 2055 State Agency Species Conservation
  • § 2056 Landowner Liability For Species Surveys
  • § 2061 Endangered Species Conservation Methods

References

  • Official text at leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
  • California Legislature. Fish and Game Code. Section 2053.
View Official Source