§ 1365 Oak Woodland Grant Guidelines

This law tells a board how to write rules for giving out money to protect oak woodlands, and says they should pick land deals that give the most bang for the buck.

Key Takeaways

•The board must write clear rules for giving out oak‑woodland grants.
•They have to talk with forestry, agriculture, universities, conservation groups, and ranchers while making the rules.
•Easements that cost less compared to how valuable the oak habitat is get top priority.

Example

A farmer wants to sell an easement that protects a strip of oak trees on his ranch. The board looks at how much the easement costs and how valuable the oak habitat is before deciding to give him a grant.

The board will compare the price the farmer asks for the easement to the ecological value of the oak trees. If the price is low compared to the value, the farmer’s easement gets priority for the grant.

How to Calculate

Cost‑Effectiveness Ratio = Grant Cost ÷ Resource Value

Find the total amount of money the grant would pay for the easement (Grant Cost).
Find the estimated ecological value of the oak woodland being protected (Resource Value).
Divide the Grant Cost by the Resource Value. A smaller result means the easement is more cost‑effective.

A rancher offers an easement that costs $150,000 and the oak woodland it protects is valued at $600,000.

Result: Cost‑Effectiveness Ratio = 150,000 ÷ 600,000 = 0.25. Because the ratio is low, this easement is considered very cost‑effective and would be given priority.

The board shall develop and adopt guidelines and criteria for awarding grants that achieve the greatest lasting conservation of oak woodlands. The board shall develop these guidelines in consultation with the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, the Department of Food and Agriculture, the University of California’s Integrated Hardwood Range Management Program, conservation groups, and farming and ranching associations. As it applies to the award of grants for the implementation of this article, the board criteria shall specify that easement acquisitions that are the most cost-effective in comparison to the actual resource value of the easement shall be given priority. (Added by Stats. 2001, Ch. 588, Sec. 2. Effective January 1, 2002.)

This law tells a board how to write rules for giving out money to protect oak woodlands, and says they should pick land deals that give the most bang for the buck.

Key Takeaways

•The board must write clear rules for giving out oak‑woodland grants.
•They have to talk with forestry, agriculture, universities, conservation groups, and ranchers while making the rules.
•Easements that cost less compared to how valuable the oak habitat is get top priority.

Example

How to Calculate

Cost‑Effectiveness Ratio = Grant Cost ÷ Resource Value

Find the total amount of money the grant would pay for the easement (Grant Cost).
Find the estimated ecological value of the oak woodland being protected (Resource Value).
Divide the Grant Cost by the Resource Value. A smaller result means the easement is more cost‑effective.

A rancher offers an easement that costs $150,000 and the oak woodland it protects is valued at $600,000.

Result: Cost‑Effectiveness Ratio = 150,000 ÷ 600,000 = 0.25. Because the ratio is low, this easement is considered very cost‑effective and would be given priority.

Key Takeaways

Example

How to Calculate

Key Terms

References

§ 1365 Oak Woodland Grant Guidelines

Key Takeaways

Example

How to Calculate

Key Terms

References

Key Takeaways

Example

How to Calculate

Key Terms

Related Statutes

References

Key Takeaways

Example

How to Calculate

Key Terms

Related Statutes

References