LawWiki
HomeCodesSearchGlossaryAPIAbout
LawWiki

Plain English summaries of California law with zero-hallucination AI. Every summary is verified against official source text.

Product

  • Search
  • Codes
  • About

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Disclaimer

© 2026 LawWiki. All rights reserved.

HomeEvidence CodeDiv. 10Ch. 2Art. 3§ 1236 Consistent Witness Statements Admissible

§ 1236 Consistent Witness Statements Admissible

Evidence Code·California
AI Summary·Official Text·Key Terms·Related Statutes·References
AI SummaryVerified

§ 1236 Consistent Witness Statements Admissible

Key Takeaways

  • •If someone says something before a trial and then says the same thing in court, it can be used as evidence.
  • •This only works if the statement matches what they say in court.
  • •The statement must follow the rules in Section 791.

Example

A person tells their friend, 'I saw the car run the red light,' and then says the same thing in court.

Because they said the same thing before and in court, their earlier statement can be used as evidence.

AI-generated — May contain errors. Not legal advice. Always verify source.

Official Source
View on CA.gov

§ 1236 Consistent Witness Statements Admissible

Evidence of a statement previously made by a witness is not made inadmissible by the hearsay rule if the statement is consistent with his testimony at the hearing and is offered in compliance with Section 791. (Enacted by Stats. 1965, Ch. 299.)

Last verified: January 22, 2026

Key Terms

hearsay ruleSection 791

Related Statutes

  • § 1235 Prior Inconsistent Witness Statements
  • § 1237 Witness Past Statement Admissibility
  • § 1238 Witness Identification Statements
  • § 1220 Admissions Against Party
  • § 1221 Adopted Statement Exception

References

  • Official text at leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
  • California Legislature. Evidence Code. Section 1236.
View Official Source