LawWiki
HomeCodesSearchGlossaryAPIAbout
LawWiki

Plain English summaries of California law with zero-hallucination AI. Every summary is verified against official source text.

Product

  • Search
  • Codes
  • About

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Disclaimer

© 2026 LawWiki. All rights reserved.

HomeBusiness and Professions CodeGeneral ProvisionsCh. 2Art. 9§ 14247 Famous Mark Dilution Protection

§ 14247 Famous Mark Dilution Protection

Business and Professions Code·California
AI Summary·Official Text·Key Terms·Related Statutes·References
AI SummaryVerified

§ 14247 Famous Mark Dilution Protection

Key Takeaways

  • •If a brand name is really famous (like everyone knows it), the owner can stop others from using a similar name if it makes the famous brand seem less special.
  • •The famous brand must be well-known in California (or part of it) to get this protection.
  • •People can still use the famous brand name for fair reasons, like comparing products, making fun of it, or talking about it in the news.
  • •If someone intentionally tries to harm the famous brand, the owner can ask for more help from the court.

Example

A small company starts selling shoes called 'Nikee' with a similar logo to Nike.

Nike is a famous brand, and 'Nikee' could make people think less of Nike’s special name. Nike can ask the court to stop the small company from using 'Nikee' because it weakens their brand.

AI-generated — May contain errors. Not legal advice. Always verify source.

Official Source
View on CA.gov

§ 14247 Famous Mark Dilution Protection

(a) Subject to the principles of equity, an owner of a mark that is famous and distinctive, whether inherently or through acquired distinctiveness, shall be entitled to an injunction against another person’s commercial use of a mark or trade name, if such use begins after the mark has become famous and is likely to cause dilution of the famous mark, and to obtain such other relief as is provided in this section. For purposes of this subdivision, a mark is famous if it is widely recognized by the general consuming public of this state, or by a geographic area of this state, as a designation of source of the goods or services of the mark’s owner. In determining whether a mark is famous, a court may consider factors including, but not limited to, all of the following: (1) The duration, extent, and geographic reach of advertising and publicity of the mark in this state, whether advertised or publicized by the owner or third parties. (2) The amount, volume, and geographic extent of sales in this state of goods or services offered under the mark. (3) The extent of actual recognition of the mark in this state. (4) Whether the mark is the subject of a state registration in this state, or a federal registration under the Act of March 3, 1881, or under the Act of February 20, 1905, or on the principal register under the Trademark Act of 1946 (15 U.S.C. Sec. 1051 et seq.), as amended. (b) In an action brought under this section, the owner of a famous mark shall be entitled to injunctive relief throughout the geographic area in which the mark is found to have become famous prior to commencement of the junior use, but not beyond the borders of this state. If the person against whom injunctive relief is sought willfully intended to cause dilution of the famous mark, the owner shall also be entitled to the remedies set forth in Section 14250, subject to the discretion of the court and the principles of equity. The following shall not be actionable under this section: (1) Any fair use, including a nominative or descriptive fair use, or facilitation of such fair use, of a famous mark by another person other than as a designation of source for the person’s own goods or services, including use in connection with either of the following: (A) Advertising or promotion that permits consumers to compare goods or services. (B) Identifying and parodying, criticizing, or commenting upon the famous mark owner or the goods or services of the famous mark owner. (2) Noncommercial use of the mark. (3) All forms of news reporting and news commentary. (Added by Stats. 2007, Ch. 711, Sec. 2. Effective January 1, 2008.)

Last verified: January 22, 2026

Key Terms

famous and distinctivedilutioninjunctiondesignation of source

Related Statutes

  • § 1002 Chiropractic Act Injunctions
  • § 10081 Commissioner Injunction Authority
  • § 14245 Trademark Infringement Penalties
  • § 14250 Counterfeit Mark Enforcement
  • § 14252 Registrant Penal Rights Preservation

References

  • Official text at leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
  • California Legislature. Business and Professions Code. Section 14247.
View Official Source