LawWiki
HomeCodesSearchGlossaryAPIAbout
LawWiki

Plain English summaries of California law with zero-hallucination AI. Every summary is verified against official source text.

Product

  • Search
  • Codes
  • About

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Disclaimer

© 2026 LawWiki. All rights reserved.

HomeCommercial CodeDiv. 2Ch. 2§ 2210 Contract Performance Delegation Rules

§ 2210 Contract Performance Delegation Rules

Commercial Code·California
AI Summary·Official Text·Key Terms·Related Statutes·References
AI SummaryVerified

§ 2210 Contract Performance Delegation Rules

Key Takeaways

  • •You can let someone else do your part of a deal, unless the other person really wants you to do it yourself.
  • •You can give your rights from a deal to someone else, unless it makes things harder or riskier for the other person.
  • •If you give your rights away, you’re still responsible if something goes wrong.
  • •If someone takes over your part of the deal, the other person can ask them to prove they’ll do it right.

Example

You hire a painter to paint your house, but the painter lets their friend do the job instead.

The painter can let their friend do the job unless you really wanted the painter to do it themselves. But if the friend messes up, the painter is still responsible for fixing it.

AI-generated — May contain errors. Not legal advice. Always verify source.

Official Source
View on CA.gov

§ 2210 Contract Performance Delegation Rules

(1) A party may perform his or her duty through a delegate unless otherwise agreed or unless the other party has a substantial interest in having his or her original promisor perform or control the acts required by the contract. No delegation of performance relieves the party delegating of any duty to perform or any liability for breach. (2) Except as otherwise provided in Section 9406, unless otherwise agreed, all rights of either seller or buyer can be assigned except where the assignment would materially change the duty of the other party, or increase materially the burden or risk imposed on him or her by his or her contract, or impair materially his or her chance of obtaining return performance. A right to damages for breach of the whole contract or a right arising out of the assignor’s due performance of his or her entire obligation can be assigned despite agreement otherwise. (3) The creation, attachment, perfection, or enforcement of a security interest in the seller’s interest under a contract is not a transfer that materially changes the duty of, or increases materially the burden or risk imposed on, the buyer or impairs materially the buyer’s chance of obtaining return performance within the purview of subdivision (2) unless, and then only to the extent that, enforcement actually results in a delegation of material performance of the seller. Even in that event, the creation, attachment, perfection, and enforcement of the security interest remain effective, but (A) the seller is liable to the buyer for damages caused by the delegation to the extent that the damages could not reasonably be prevented by the buyer, and (B) a court having jurisdiction may grant other appropriate relief, including cancellation of the contract for sale or an injunction against enforcement of the security interest or consummation of the enforcement. (4) Unless the circumstances indicate the contrary, a prohibition of assignment of “the contract” is to be construed as barring only the delegation to the assignee of the assignor’s performance. (5) An assignment of “the contract” or of “all my rights under the contract” or an assignment in similar general terms is an assignment of rights and, unless the language or the circumstances (as in an assignment for security) indicate the contrary, it is a delegation of performance of the duties of the assignor, and its acceptance by the assignee constitutes a promise by him or her to perform those duties. This promise is enforceable by either the assignor or the other party to the original contract. (6) The other party may treat any assignment which delegates performance as creating reasonable grounds for insecurity and may, without prejudice to his or her rights against the assignor, demand assurances from the assignee (Section 2609). (Amended (as to be amended by Stats. 1999, Ch. 991) by Stats. 2000, Ch. 1003, Sec. 4. Effective January 1, 2001. Operative July 1, 2001, by Sec. 56 of Ch. 1003.)

Last verified: January 23, 2026

Key Terms

delegatesubstantial interestassignmentmaterially changesecurity interestdelegation of performance

Related Statutes

  • § 4210 Bank Security Interest Rules
  • § 4211 Bank Holder Due Course
  • § 7209 Warehouse Lien On Goods
  • § 9203 Security Interest Attachment Conditions
  • § 9205 Debtor Control Of Collateral

References

  • Official text at leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
  • California Legislature. Commercial Code. Section 2210.
View Official Source