LawWiki
HomeCodesSearchGlossaryAPIAbout
LawWiki

Plain English summaries of California law with zero-hallucination AI. Every summary is verified against official source text.

Product

  • Search
  • Codes
  • About

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Disclaimer

© 2026 LawWiki. All rights reserved.

HomeCommercial CodeDiv. 11Ch. 2§ 11208 Bank Identification Number Reliance

§ 11208 Bank Identification Number Reliance

Commercial Code·California
AI Summary·Official Text·Key Terms·Related Statutes·References
AI SummaryVerified

§ 11208 Bank Identification Number Reliance

This law says that if you send money to a bank using just a number (like an account number), the bank can trust that number even if it's wrong. If the number is wrong and the bank loses money because of it, you have to pay them back.

Key Takeaways

  • •Banks can trust the account number you give them, even if it's wrong.
  • •If the bank loses money because of a wrong number, you have to pay them back.
  • •If you give both a name and a number, and they don't match, the bank can still trust the number if they don't know about the mismatch.

Example

You want to send money to your friend's bank, but you accidentally type in the wrong account number.

The bank will send the money to the wrong account because they trust the number you gave. If the bank loses money because of this mistake, you have to pay them back.

AI-generated — May contain errors. Not legal advice. Always verify source.

Official Source
View on CA.gov

§ 11208 Bank Identification Number Reliance

(a) This subdivision applies to a payment order identifying an intermediary bank or the beneficiary’s bank only by an identifying number. (1) The receiving bank may rely on the number as the proper identification of the intermediary or beneficiary’s bank and need not determine whether the number identifies a bank. (2) The sender is obliged to compensate the receiving bank for any loss and expenses incurred by the receiving bank as a result of its reliance on the number in executing or attempting to execute the order. (b) This subdivision applies to a payment order identifying an intermediary bank or the beneficiary’s bank both by name and an identifying number if the name and number identify different persons. (1) If the sender is a bank, the receiving bank may rely on the number as the proper identification of the intermediary or beneficiary’s bank if the receiving bank, when it executes the sender’s order, does not know that the name and number identify different persons. The receiving bank need not determine whether the name and number refer to the same person or whether the number refers to a bank. The sender is obliged to compensate the receiving bank for any loss and expenses incurred by the receiving bank as a result of its reliance on the number in executing or attempting to execute the order. (2) If the sender is not a bank and the receiving bank proves that the sender, before the payment order was accepted, had notice that the receiving bank might rely on the number as the proper identification of the intermediary or beneficiary’s bank even if it identifies a person different from the bank identified by name, the rights and obligations of the sender and the receiving bank are governed by paragraph (1) of subdivision (b), as though the sender were a bank. Proof of notice may be made by any admissible evidence. The receiving bank satisfies the burden of proof if it proves that the sender, before the payment order was accepted, signed a record stating the information to which the notice relates. (3) Regardless of whether the sender is a bank, the receiving bank may rely on the name as the proper identification of the intermediary or beneficiary’s bank if the receiving bank, at the time it executes the sender’s order, does not know that the name and number identify different persons. The receiving bank need not determine whether the name and number refer to the same person. (4) If the receiving bank knows that the name and number identify different persons, reliance on either the name or the number in executing the sender’s payment order is a breach of the obligation stated in paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of Section 11302. (Amended by Stats. 2023, Ch. 210, Sec. 86. (SB 95) Effective January 1, 2024.)

Last verified: January 10, 2026

Key Terms

relianceobligationidentificationevidence

Related Statutes

  • § 11202 Payment Order Authorization Rules
  • § 11204 Unauthorized Payment Order Refunds
  • § 1203 Lease Vs Security Interest
  • § 10201 Lease Contract Enforcement Requirements
  • § 10202 Confirmatory Memoranda Terms

References

  • Official text at leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
  • California Legislature. Commercial Code. Section 11208.
View Official Source