LawWiki
HomeCodesSearchGlossaryAPIAbout
LawWiki

Plain English summaries of California law with zero-hallucination AI. Every summary is verified against official source text.

Product

  • Search
  • Codes
  • About

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Disclaimer

© 2026 LawWiki. All rights reserved.

HomeCommercial CodeDiv. 11Ch. 2§ 11207 Beneficiary Identification Rules

§ 11207 Beneficiary Identification Rules

Commercial Code·California
AI Summary·Official Text·Key Terms·Related Statutes·References
AI SummaryVerified

§ 11207 Beneficiary Identification Rules

This law says that if a payment order has a wrong or mismatched name or account number, the bank can’t treat anyone as the proper recipient unless the info matches, and if money is paid to the wrong person it can be taken back.

Key Takeaways

  • •If a payment order lists a name or account that doesn’t exist, no one can claim the money.
  • •When the name and account number point to different people, the bank may rely on the number unless it knows they’re different.
  • •Money paid to the wrong person can be taken back, either by the sender or the sender’s bank.

Example

Alice sends $500 to Bob, but the payment order lists Bob’s name and Carol’s account number. The bank sees the number and pays Carol.

Because the name and number point to different people, the bank can rely on the number and pay Carol. Since Carol wasn’t supposed to get the money, the law lets Alice (or her bank) get the $500 back.

How to Calculate

Recovered amount = Amount paid (when the payer is obligated or the payer’s bank can recover)

  1. Find out how much money was actually paid to the wrong person.
  2. Check if the originator (the one who sent the money) is a bank. If yes, the originator can recover the full amount.
  3. If the originator is not a bank, see if the originator’s bank can prove it didn’t know the mistake. If not, the originator’s bank can recover the full amount.
  4. The recovery amount is the same as the amount that was paid out.

Alice’s $500 payment was sent to Carol by mistake.

Result: $500 can be recovered by Alice (or Alice’s bank) under the law.

AI-generated — May contain errors. Not legal advice. Always verify source.

Official Source
View on CA.gov

§ 11207 Beneficiary Identification Rules

(a) Subject to subdivision (b), if, in a payment order received by the beneficiary’s bank, the name, bank account number, or other identification of the beneficiary refers to a nonexistent or unidentifiable person or account, no person has rights as a beneficiary of the order and acceptance of the order cannot occur. (b) If a payment order received by the beneficiary’s bank identifies the beneficiary both by name and by an identifying or bank account number and the name and number identify different persons, the following rules apply: (1) Except as otherwise provided in subdivision (c), if the beneficiary’s bank does not know that the name and number refer to different persons, it may rely on the number as the proper identification of the beneficiary of the order. The beneficiary’s bank need not determine whether the name and number refer to the same person. (2) If the beneficiary’s bank pays the person identified by name or knows that the name and number identify different persons, no person has rights as beneficiary except the person paid by the beneficiary’s bank if that person was entitled to receive payment from the originator of the funds transfer. If no person has rights as beneficiary, acceptance of the order cannot occur. (c) If (i) a payment order described in subdivision (b) is accepted, (ii) the originator’s payment order described the beneficiary inconsistently by name and number, and (iii) the beneficiary’s bank pays the person identified by number as permitted by paragraph (1) of subdivision (b), the following rules apply: (1) If the originator is a bank, the originator is obliged to pay its order. (2) If the originator is not a bank and proves that the person identified by number was not entitled to receive payment from the originator, the originator is not obliged to pay its order unless the originator’s bank proves that the originator, before acceptance of the originator’s order, had notice that payment of a payment order issued by the originator might be made by the beneficiary’s bank on the basis of an identifying or bank account number even if it identifies a person different from the named beneficiary. Proof of notice may be made by any admissible evidence. The originator’s bank satisfies the burden of proof if it proves that the originator, before the payment order was accepted, signed a record stating the information to which the notice relates. (d) In a case governed by paragraph (1) of subdivision (b), if the beneficiary’s bank rightfully pays the person identified by number and that person was not entitled to receive payment from the originator, the amount paid may be recovered from that person to the extent allowed by the law governing mistake and restitution as follows: (1) If the originator is obliged to pay its payment order as stated in subdivision (c), the originator has the right to recover. (2) If the originator is not a bank and is not obliged to pay its payment order, the originator’s bank has the right to recover. (Amended by Stats. 2023, Ch. 210, Sec. 85. (SB 95) Effective January 1, 2024.)

Last verified: January 10, 2026

Key Terms

payment orderbeneficiary’s bankidentifying or bank account numberoriginatoracceptance of the order

Related Statutes

  • § 11201 Payment Order Security Procedures
  • § 11202 Payment Order Authorization Rules
  • § 11203 Unauthorized Payment Order Limits
  • § 11206 Payment Order Transmission Rules
  • § 11210 Payment Order Rejection

References

  • Official text at leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
  • California Legislature. Commercial Code. Section 11207.
View Official Source